Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK.AX)

About Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF

Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF is a thematic ETF tracking the cybersecurity theme, holding 45 positions. This page values what the fund actually holds — a look-through discounted cash flow of every underlying company, weighted by fund weight — refreshed monthly. The management fee shown is the issuer's stated cost.

Holdings from the issuer's published file; prices and fundamentals from Yahoo Finance. General information only.

Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF HACK.AX

Cybersecurity · holdings as at 2026-09-29

HACK.AX
AUD 18.60
Implied fair value
AUD 9.86
vs intrinsic value
-47% (premium)
Coverage
92%
Management fee
0.67%
Holdings
45

Look-through valuation

Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF's holdings collectively trade 47% above their combined intrinsic value — an implied fair value of about AUD 9.86 versus AUD 18.60 today.

Based on 36 of 45 valued holdings, 92% of fund weight; 9 unvalued. 13th of 21 thematic ETFs by look-through value.

Priciest holding MICROSOFT CORP-95% (premium)
Cheapest holding SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI+73% (discount)

Holdings we can value top 15 by weight

WeightHoldingModelvs intrinsic value
8.9% CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC DCF -83% (premium)
8.1% FORTINET INC DCF -59% (premium)
8.0% PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC DCF -63% (premium)
7.6% CISCO SYSTEMS INC DCF -70% (premium)
7.5% BROADCOM INC DCF -59% (premium)
4.5% CLOUDFLARE INC DCF -90% (premium)
4.4% OKTA INC DCF -49% (premium)
3.6% ZSCALER INC DCF -5% (premium)
3.6% F5 INC DCF -52% (premium)
2.7% RUBRIK INC DCF -51% (premium)
2.2% DATADOG INC DCF -83% (premium)
2.2% NETAPP INC DCF -64% (premium)
2.1% DYNATRACE INC DCF -22% (premium)
2.1% AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC DCF -47% (premium)
2.0% ARISTA NETWORKS INC DCF -69% (premium)

Remaining 21 valued holdings (23% of fund) collectively trade 3% above their combined intrinsic value.

What the fund holds

By sector

  • Information Technology 92.3%
  • Industrials 5.5%
  • Communication Services 2.2%

By country

  • United States 96.6%
  • France 1.9%
  • Japan 0.9%
  • Canada 0.6%

From the issuer's published holdings file.

How this is calculated

Each holding is valued with the same engine behind KashVector's DCF tool and its undervalued screens — a conservative 5-year discounted cash flow, or a dividend / excess-return model for banks, insurers and regulated utilities, a P/AFFO multiple for property REITs, an EV/EBITDA multiple for airlines, or an EV/Sales comparison for a small tail the cash-flow models can't value. Where the DCF needs a forward growth rate we use the slower of a holding's multi-year revenue trend and its multi-year free-cash-flow trend, so one distorted year at one company can't skew the fund's number. Each holding's premium or discount to its own intrinsic value is weighted by fund weight and summed.

Read this as a measurement, not a verdict. The 5-year DCF is deliberately conservative on growth, so a premium is partly the model's own caution. Fast-growing and AI-exposed holdings in particular can read as heavily overvalued because a short-horizon cash-flow model can't capture a genuine platform shift or growth that currently shows up as investment rather than free cash flow. A fund can also trade above a conservative intrinsic value for years while compounding. A point-in-time snapshot as at 2026-09-30, highly sensitive to assumptions. Not financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

Does Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF trade above or below the value of what it holds?

As at 2026-09-30, its holdings collectively trade 47% above their combined intrinsic value, over 92% of fund weight. A mechanical measurement, not advice.

Does a premium mean I should sell?

No. Nothing here is financial advice and it is never a buy, sell or hold call. A theme can trade above a conservative intrinsic value for a long time while still compounding.

Why do the tech / AI holdings read as so overvalued?

A 5-year discounted cash flow can't price a genuine platform shift, and it penalises companies whose growth currently shows up as capital investment rather than free cash flow. It reflects the model's limitation as much as the price.

How often is this updated?

Monthly. Holdings come from the issuer's published full-holdings file; prices and fundamentals are a monthly snapshot from Yahoo Finance, not a live feed.